A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out concerning potential neighbours more than the construction of the wall in a coastal website in a very north Dublin suburb, a situation which includes captivated nationwide attention adhering to an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed household dwelling at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental concerns, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Situations article about René Collier as well as the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced into a hugely publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building operates at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and an organization director respectively, look for to build their family members house. The situation has grown to be emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, wherever growth pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of set up residents. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting constructed by their future neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted under scheduling permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their planning authorization by building a wall outside of the boundaries in their internet site, leading to an encroachment over a Special Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result areas are subject matter to strict controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Within their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have lasting ecological penalties, specifically inside of a sensitive coastal setting which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach in their setting up permission, and say the wall, which can be partially designed, is in the proper place. Their authorized crew has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their view, an allegation that has been repeated in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal setting up disputes, where by sights of The ocean are equally remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular attempts with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the website, In accordance with sworn evidence referenced in the Irish Situations. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by way of waist-higher h2o all through a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods, an image which includes considering the fact that develop into emblematic on the intensity of your dispute. These actions weren't just symbolic; they had been meant to Get Visible evidence of the wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website from the sea Irish Periods noted, describing how The 2 Males entered the h2o in the course of severe weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm water to photograph the location became Just about the most putting descriptions to emerge from court reporting. The Irish Periods post about accountant Paul Feely observed that this kind of actions ended up cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a region affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been protected intimately by the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned widely searched phrases as readers sought to grasp the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court listened to even more submissions on whether or not interim orders must be granted to halt development pending a complete Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential minute from the authorized timeline.
With the core in the dispute can be a disagreement in excess of boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain that the wall, as constructed, goes beyond what was approved and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, is described as meticulous in his assessment of arranging documents, maps, and conditions hooked up on the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those stressed that their motion is determined by concern for environmental defense and adherence to organizing regulation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public view, insisting in its place that it is about making sure that advancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they have described their extensive-standing link to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a couple basically trying to make a family property in accordance Using the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches with a Unique Place of Conservation and say that all operates are performed according to Specialist information and authorized strategies. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including entering the sea in the course of a storm, tend not to change the underlying information.
The case has also elevated broader questions about how preparing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute more than building of wall at coastal website is now a shorthand description for any circumstance that lots of observers see as progressively frequent. As sea amounts rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation involving personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats is now far more contentious.
The Irish Instances write-up about René Collier noted which the businessman had Beforehand been involved with neighborhood advocacy on preparing and environmental issues, while not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Times short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from extremely distinctive Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, became synonymous Using the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of midsection-large h2o throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Times and René Collier waded by way of midsection-high drinking water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting each the Bodily fact with the coastline and the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an abnormal tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings continue, the outcome remains unsure. The court docket will have to determine whether or not the wall as built complies with planning authorization and whether any encroachment right into a Distinctive Space of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and organizing situations. However the human component continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Stay along with each other extensive following the legal costs are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than construction will work at the positioning on Dublin Irish Times article about René Collier Road, Sutton, but the implications of the situation extend further than that deal with. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the value of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. What's more, it underscores how swiftly an area disagreement can escalate when fundamental difficulties like environmental defense and home legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of normal beauty and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre of the dispute stands partially designed, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized thoughts. Regardless of whether it will eventually in the end be altered, taken off, or completed as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will very likely continue on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to one of the most closely viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.